Like mothers with their babies, authors are prone to parade their book covers in the shameless pursuit of praise and adulation. And I’m afraid that I’m no exception.
But, unlike babies, book covers result from a meeting of minds, usually ones with a good understanding of the more commercial aspects of publishing. It seems to be a real bonus if the author actually likes what her ‘baby’ looks like. I’m very fortunate, because I ADORE MY NEW COVER!
I loved the first one, too, for The Importance of Being Emma. The legs summed up my heroine perfectly – elegant and sexy, with a hint of mischief. They were also the first thing that the hero noticed when he met her in the opening chapter.
In fact, I’d had so many compliments about this cover that I was a bit disappointed when Choc Lit decided on a change of body parts for my second novel.
So, no legs for Persuade Me.
But what would my publisher come up with? I had visions of a headless torso, which seems to be a growing trend for Regency romance. However, I’m writing modern stories – not a heaving bosom in sight. And this heroine, Anna Elliot, is a lot different from Emma Woodhouse – more restrained and romantic, longing for another life. Would there be a demure pair of folded hands, perhaps, or bare feet caressing the sand?
Finally, I heard from Choc Lit. ‘We think it should be a girl’s head, in soft focus,’ they said.
OK. I’d seen Margaret James’s covers for The Silver Locket and The Golden Chain, of course - gorgeous, and very evocative of their period. But would they work for a 21st-century heroine, even if she does prefer her men to stay between the covers of 19th-century Russian novels?
Then Choc Lit sent me this …
… and I thought, ‘Wow! It captures Anna’s fragile beauty, hints at her gentle nature - and shows off the neck that Rick Wentworth once found so irresistible.’
What more can I say? Except that, like any proud mother, I want a shower of compliments for my ‘baby’!